[Please read the following with this caveat: it is a draft composed in a single sitting, without much by way of refinement or editing. Feel free to read, comment, and above all question.]
I was recently asked to answer following, about God. It’s a good question, and one that bears answering. I think it’s a particularly pointed question, what with today being Palm Sunday and all. And if we don’t want to be like the fair-weather followers who were spreading palm branches and clothing on the road before Christ on Sunday, but ready to crucify him with equal passion by Friday, it is a question that must be answered.
“What about him is compelling, or inspires you to worship or follow him?”
First, the innate desire to worship something. People, all people and in all cultures, desire to worship SOMETHING. Wherever there are people, there are belief-systems and deities of some sort whether through formalized religion or through strongly-held beliefs and causes to which people dedicate their lives. As Jung would say, there is a God-archetype. Everything else will be framed in light of this.
But of course, the real question is not “Why worship?” but “Why worship this God?” Why choose this road, the road of sacrifice, the road of becoming less and dying to self, whatever that means and whatever it costs, when it’s so antithetical to the pleasure we all desire on some level.
Before getting in too far, I’d like to clarify the assumptions I’m going to be working with. In depth discussion of the rationale behind these choices will have to be saved for another post.
1.) The Scriptures, as originally given, are literally inspired and true. This does not excuse them from the problems in transmission that afflict all documents of their age, but they nevertheless maintain that quality underneath the transmission difficulties.
2.) God is.
3.) God is powerful, and without equal. The corollary of this is that whatever power/ability the satan exerts in the world occurs only within the will of and by the authority God.
4.) God is neither moral nor ethical, because both morality and ethics imply choice and God does not/cannot change.
5.) God, being God, does not necessarily “play by our rules.” This is God’s sandbox, and he makes the rules rather than the other way around. Beyond that, we’re mortal and bound by our mortality and temporality… God does not share our limitations.
Now, it’s one thing to worship the God of ressurection, of healing, of spring flowers and gentle rains and joy and freedom from sin. That’s an easy God to worship, because he provides pleasure and goodness, and like the good behavioral creatures that we are we like pleasure and good things. There’s nothing wrong with that. It’s great.
But we all know that that’s not the whole story– there’s a crucifixion to go with that resurrection, sickness and death to go with the healing, winter death to go with spring flowers. In short, that there is both good and bad in the world we inhabit. So what then?
I am the Lord, and there is no other. Beside me, there is no other God. I will gird you, though you have not known me, that all may know from the rising to the setting of the son that there is none beside me. I am the Lord, and there is no other. I form light and create darkness. I make peace, and create evil. It is I the Lord who does all these things. (From Isaiah 45)
This is not a very cuddly God. This is the God of the mountains, so terrifying that those who encounter him say things like “Do not let God speak to us, lest we die!” This is definitely the God of Job, who would allow a blameless man to lose everything on earth he held dear to demonstrate that he will, in fact, follow God without those things… and who would respond to his servant’s complaint with series of long speeches to the general effect of “Are you God, or am I?”
If (1.) is true, then this aspect of God must be accepted as well, and not only accepted but reconciled with the more comforting statements like “God is love” or “My yoke is easy and my burden is light.” This is my proposition: Properly understood, “I am the Lord… I…create evil.” is just as comforting as being lead by still waters and quiet pastures. That the God of the resurrection is innately compatible with the God who allowed his son to die.
Shall the potter be considered equal with the clay, that what is made should say to its maker “He did not make me!” or what is formed say to him who formed it, “He has no understanding”? (From Isaiah 29)
Then the word of the Lord came to Jeremiah, saying “Arise and go down to the potter’s house, and I will speak to you there. Then I went down the the potter’s house, and he was there making something on his wheel. But the clay vessel he created was spoiled in the hand of the potter; so he remade it into another vessel; as it pleased the potter to make. Then the word of the Lord came to me saying, “Can I not, O Israel, deal with you as this potter does with his clay?” (From Jeremiah 18)
God is the potter. I am compelled to worship him because I am the clay in his hands. And I find it comforting that however many times the pot might have to be remade before it is as it should be, the potter has a plan for good. God is one who has a plan… and all the parts within that plan work toward accomplishing it, however they may seem to us at the time. God does not say there will be no suffering, but that he will be with us in the suffering. Jesus does not offer no-yoke, but rather his yoke. It is not that we will not have to enter the valley, but rather that we do not need to fear the valley because God remains with us even in the darkest of times. Perhaps more than anything else, the presence of God in those moments compels me to worship. Also compelling, that God allows us to question him… to doubt, to fear, to be angry with the dark times when they come. We may or may not receive the answers we crave, but we are heard by one who can commiserate with the pain we experience, and are given the dual reassurances of plan and presence in the moments they matter most. As C.S. Lewis would say, pain is God’s megaphone to a deaf world… the pain may be unpleasant but it is where the presence of God is… and it is where we learn who he is and who we may be.
Behold, I am with you. (God)
It is, for me, that which is most compelling. I surrender and sacrifice and follow for many reasons, but Christ and love and presence are what captivates me and compels me to continue following this God whether or not I always understand or like what happens in his world. In the end I don’t have to, however much I might wish to. Whether or not I understand it all, God works in the darkness… and shows himself most clearly and often in those moments where he seems to have been absent for so long. God delights in toppling our understandings and turning everything as we know it on its head. Thus, he brought a nation out of an infertile man and his old wife, the savior of the world out of a group of brow-beaten slaves, one of the greatest miracles of all time out of one of the worst deaths ever devised by man… And this too captivates me, this Jewish rabbi who touched the untouchables, loved the unlovable, and brought together the most diverse elements of his culture to show mercy to all of them while they try to figure out what they’re doing in the same room. What choice is there but to worship, while my own world gets turned on its head once again? There is a plan and a purpose to it, albeit one I don’t see, and God is here. It is enough, more than enough, and almost more than I can bear… and in light of it all, I am compelled to worship.





I have to admit I didn’t read very carefully after assumtion number 1. I want to know why you start with the assumptions you start with. That would be much more informative. I know why someone would worship God if one see the Bible as true (etc) and God as unchanging and totally in control. But I think the more important question (at least for me) is why you assume those things.
I’ve read on many blogs aboutths inate desires to worsip something . I don’t know if it’s just semantics, but I think of woworship as as something like ase mixed with fear and a desire to propitiate the object of fear..
I can honestly say that I’ve never felt a desire to do this. Awe, however, is something I’ve esxperiences a lot ad to me it speaks to the true mysteriousnes of life.
Thanks for the answer.
“this too captivates me, this Jewish rabbi who touched the untouchables, loved the unlovable, and brought together the most diverse elements of his culture to show mercy to all of them”
“God is neither moral nor ethical, because both morality and ethics imply choice and God does not/cannot change.”
“This is God’s sandbox, and he makes the rules rather than the other way around.”
Okay, so this may be a terrible take from your post, but it seems that you would say, worship God because God exists, God created us, and God is good (but unjudgeable to be good or bad by us). Yes, Jesus is inspiring but if Jesus came and went around raping children, worship would still be compelled from us because God does what God does.
Hope I didn’t butcher your words too much.
I would agree that the duality of love is not always giving and comforting but also has an important element of correction. Much as a parent loves their child and will provide or give to the child, a good parent will also correct and if necessary discipline a child so that they will become a better person. That logic shouldn’t be followed to suggest that the only way that a child can learn is while being disciplined.
“As C.S. Lewis would say, pain is God’s megaphone to a deaf world… the pain may be unpleasant but it is where the presence of God is… and it is where we learn who he is and who we may be.”
To say that pain and suffering is God’s gifts seems to imply that there is some higher nobility in those who suffer the most, but did not Christ come so that we could live and live more abundantly? As far as I know, nowhere in the New Testament did Christ ever bring the miracle of endless suffering of disease to someone, yet he taught so many. God is always there, both in the joyful moments of our lives as well as when the sky has darkened.
“Whether or not I understand it all, God works in the darkness… and shows himself most clearly and often in those moments where he seems to have been absent for so long. God delights in toppling our understandings and turning EVERYTHING as we know it on its head.”
I hope the intent of the above paragraph was not to paint God as a random malcontent miscreant who pops in and out of our life delighting in our confusion and frustration. While I may not always understand why, I do believe that God has a plan for me and that plan is not that I should suffer or dwell in confusion and angst. Sometimes as I learn more about the nature of God and what it takes for me to be a better Christian, I do have to revise my thinking and at times break “the paradigm paralysis” model. But that’s not necessarily confusion.
It’s early in the morning for me and I hope i didn’t completely miss your point or as Conner said, butcher your words too much.
@Cody: As I said, assumptions are another post for another day, probably in May or so when things slow down with work. Sorry!
@Paul: I definitely don’t make that sematic use of the word. Although worship *might* involve fear/desire to satisfy the feared object, it hardly inhers it. At least in my usage. Why do you infer one from the other?
@Connor: I was going for something more along the lines of worship God because God is, is beyond us in ways we don’t have the capacity to understand, and I’d add is faithful. Again, this gets back to questions about what your take on the nature of Scripture is… but I’m a literalist, which means that if I’m going to worship at all the God I worship is one who does things I often don’t understand, or even necessarily like all the time. But there’s something of a trust issue there… and because I’m a literalist, I get to believe that the bit about promises and keeping them is also literal… whatever else happens in the meantime. If that makes sense.
@Adrian:
Sure, Christ came that we could live and live abundantly… but what’s the definition of living and living abundantly? After all, living abundantly seemed to involve a rather grisly death for the Christ we claim to follow and seek to imitate…
And no, I definitely wasn’t attempting to paint God as a “random malcontent miscreant” at all… my apologies if I did. But do I think that God takes some delight at turning our plans and understandings upside down? Certainly. The difference is, I think it’s strategic and purposeful rather than random. Make sense?
You give literalists a bad name; most just tell people they are idiots and going to hell for disagreeing. Please, keep it up.